A2 vs. O1 instrumentu tērauds: Galvenās atšķirības

1. Ievads

Among cold-work steels, A2 vs O1 tool steel occupies prominent positions in the AISI/SAE and ASTM A681 standards.

While they share a classification as cold work tool steels, their differing hardening mechanisms—air-hardening versus oil-hardening—lead to distinct behaviors in processing, sniegums, un pielietojuma piemērotība.

Instrumentu tēraudi are engineered for wear resistance, cietība, and dimensional stability—characteristics essential to cutting, veidošanās, and shaping materials in harsh industrial conditions.

This article presents a detailed comparison between A2 and O1 tool steels,

examining their composition, termiskā apstrāde, Mehāniskās īpašības, mašīnīgums, izturība pret koroziju, and industrial use cases to guide professionals in making informed material selections.

2. What Is A2 Air-Hardening Tool Steel?

A2 Tool Steel belongs to the A-Group of ASTM A681, earns its “A” designation by hardening in still air rather than oil or water.

Kā a cold-worked steel, it undergoes all forming and machining below its recrystallization temperature, delivering exceptional dimensional control and surface finish compared to hot-worked alloys.

Ķīmiskais sastāvs

Elements	Saturs (%)	Darbība
Ogleklis (C)	0.95 - 1.05	Enables high hardness and wear resistance
Hroms (Krekls)	4.75 - 5.50	Promotes hardenability and abrasion resistance
Molibdēns (Noplūde)	0.90 - 1.20	Increases temper resistance and toughness
Vanādijs (V)	0.25 - 0.40	Refines grain size and boosts secondary hardening
Mangāns (Nojaukšanās)	0.20 - 0.80	Uzlabo izturību un rūdāmību
Silīcijs (Un)	0.20 - 0.50	Aids deoxidation and enhances strength

Key Characteristics and Benefits

• Air-Hardening Mechanism: After austenitizing at approximately 1 020 ° C, A2 transforms to martensite in air, avoiding the severe thermal gradients—and distortion—that accompany oil or water quenching.
• Cietība: Properly heat-treated A2 achieves 57-62 HRC, thanks to its chromium, molibdēns, and vanadium alloying.
• Wear and Toughness: Although it lacks enough chromium to qualify as stainless (≥ 11 %),
  A2’s 5 % Cr content still produces a robust passive film for good abrasion resistance un ietekmēt izturību.
• Machinability and Edge Retention: Atkausētā stāvoklī, A2 machines easily. Pēc sacietēšanas, it holds a sharp, durable edge, making it ideal for blanking dies, sitieni, un precīzijas instrumenti.

3. What Is O1 Oil-Hardening Tool Steel?

O1 tool steel belongs to the O-Group of the ASTM A681 standard, distinguished by its requirement for oil quenching to develop full hardness.

Kā a cold-worked steel, O1 undergoes shaping and machining below its recrystallization temperature,

But it relies on rapid cooling in oil to transform its microstructure into a wear-resistant, high-hardness state.

Ķīmiskais sastāvs

Elements	Saturs (%)	Darbība
Ogleklis (C)	0.85 - 1.00	Provides core hardness and wear resistance
Mangāns (Nojaukšanās)	1.00 - 1.40	Enhances hardenability and tensile strength
Hroms (Krekls)	0.40 - 0.60	Improves hardenability and abrasion resistance
Volframs (W)	0.40 - 0.60	Boosts hot hardness and wear resistance
Vanādijs (V)	0.10 - 0.30	Refines grain structure and supports carbide formation
Silīcijs (Un)	0.10 - 0.30	Assists deoxidation and strengthens the steel matrix

Key Properties and Advantages

• Augsta cietība: O1 reaches 60–63 HRC pēcdzesēšana, making it ideal for tools requiring sharp, long-lasting edges—such as gauges, sitieni, and woodworking knives.
• Lieliska apstrādājamība: In its annealed state, O1 scores around 65% on machinability charts (with AISI 1112 kā 100%), allowing faster roughing and reduced tooling costs.
• Tight Dimensional Control (Small Sections): Oil quenching provides a moderate cooling rate that suits thinner components (līdz 15 mm),
  though larger sections risk soft spots or distortion if not uniformly agitated.
• Rentabilitāte: Lower alloy content translates to a material cost of approximately $2–$3 per kilogram, plus efficient machining and straightforward heat treatment.

4. Termiskā apstrāde & Hardening Response

Heat treatment defines the final properties of both A2 and O1 tool steels.

Šajā sadaļā, we compare their recommended thermal cycles, quenching media, rūdāmība, and tempering regimes to achieve target hardness and toughness.

A2 Air-Hardening Cycle

1. Austenitizēšana

• • Temperatūra: 1 015–1 035 ° C
  • Aiztures laiks: 30–45 minutes
  • At this range, A2 dissolves alloy carbides and forms a uniform austenitic matrix.

2. Rūdīšana

• • Vidējs: Still air at ambient temperature
  • Dzesēšanas ātrums: Lēni, reducing thermal gradients by up to 70 % compared to oil quench
  • Rezultātā, A2 transforms to martensite with minimal stress and distortion.

3. Rūdījums

• • First Temp: 150–200 °C for stress relief
  • Second Temp: 500–540 °C to tailor hardness
  • Resulting Hardness: 57-62 HRC (depending on temper temperature and time)
  • Secondary Hardening: Molybdenum and vanadium carbides precipitate, boosting high-temperature strength.

O1 Oil-Hardening Cycle

1. Austenitizēšana

• • Temperatūra: 780-820 °C
  • Aiztures laiks: 20– 30 minūtes
  • This lower temperature retains a higher fraction of fine carbides, favoring wear resistance.

2. Rūdīšana

• • Vidējs: Agitated oil at 50–70 °C
  • Dzesēšanas ātrums: Aptuveni 150 °C/s in the martensite range
  • Using oil prevents the cracking and distortion common with water quenching but introduces more stress than air cooling.

3. Rūdījums

• • Typical Temp: 150–220 ° C, single or double cycle
  • Resulting Hardness: 60–63 HRC
  • Lower temper temperatures preserve O1’s maximum hardness but limit toughness improvements.

Hardenability and Depth of Hardening

Tērauds	Depth to 50 % Martensīts	Core Hardness at 40 mm Depth
A2	~40 mm	55-58 HRC
O1	~12 mm	45–48 HRC

• Līdz ar to, A2 maintains high hardness deep into the section, whereas O1 requires thinner cross-sections or special quench fixtures to avoid soft cores.
• Turklāt, A2’s air-quench mechanism reduces quench cracking risk, making it suitable for larger dies and punches.

Recommended Tempering Regimes

• For Maximum Toughness (A2): Temper at 520–540 °C for 2 × 2 laiks, achieving ~57 HRC with K_IC > 28 MPa·√m.
• For Maximum Hardness (O1): Temper at 150–180 °C for 1 × 2 laiks, maintaining ~62 HRC but with toughness limited to ~18 MPa·√m.
• Alternatīvi, a double temper at 200 °C can slightly boost O1’s toughness at the expense of 1–2 HRC hardness.

5. Mechanical Properties of A2 vs. O1 instrumentu tērauds

A2’s higher alloy content enhances izturība un nodilums pretestība, making it less prone to chipping and cracking in high-load or impact environments.

O1, though slightly harder, trades toughness for edge stability, ideal for fine-cutting applications.

6. Mašīnīgums & Izgatavošana

• As-Annealed Machinability Ratings:

• • O1: ~65% (relative to SAE 1112)
  • A2: ~50%

O1 is easier to machine and finish prior to hardening, making it suitable for applications where quick turnaround is critical.

A2 requires more robust tooling due to its higher hardness and alloy content.

EDM and Drilling: Both materials respond well to electrical discharge machining, but A2 benefits from more consistent EDM finishes due to its finer carbide structure.

Metināmība: O1 is weldable with care, but preheat and post-weld heat treatment are essential. A2, being more alloyed, presents a higher cracking risk unless stress-relieved.

7. Izmēra stabilitāte & Izkropļojumi

Air hardening gives A2 a distinct advantage in dimensional accuracy.

Unlike O1, which may distort or warp during rapid oil cooling, A2’s slow transformation ensures minimal shape change post-quenching.

For close-tolerance tooling, A2 reduces the need for secondary grinding and corrections.

8. Izturība pret koroziju

While neither A2 nor O1 is stainless steel, A2’s 5% hroms content provides mild corrosion resistance, especially in dry or lightly humid environments.

O1, with less than 1% hroms, ir prone to surface oxidation and rust without protective coatings.

9. Typical Applications of A2 vs. O1 instrumentu tērauds

Choosing between A2 and O1 hinges on matching each steel’s strengths to specific tooling tasks.

A2 Air-Hardening Tool Steel

Thanks to its high hardenability, lieliska nodilumizturība, and minimal distortion, A2 excels in:

• Blanking and Piercing Dies: A2 maintains tight tolerances over long production runs (50 000+ strokes) without frequent regrinding.
• Forming and Stamping Tools: Its toughness withstands impact loads up to 1 200 MPA, ideal for deep-draw and bending operations.
• Progressive Die Components: A2’s uniform hardness to depths of 40 mm ensures consistent hole punching, apgriešana, and forming in multi-station dies.
• Cold-Shear Blades: With hardness up to 62 HRC and fine carbide dispersion, A2 delivers clean cuts in sheet metal up to 3 mm biezs.

O1 Oil-Hardening Tool Steel

O1 combines good hardness with superior machinability, making it the go-to choice for lower-volume or prototype tooling:

• Cutting and Slitting Knives: O1 holds a razor-sharp edge (62–63 HRC) for tasks such as slitting vinyl, papīrs, and rubber.
• Gauges and Measurement Tools: Its fine-finished surface and hardness guarantee accuracy in go/no-go plugs and pins.
• Low-Volume Dies: Small stamping or forming dies (run lengths < 10 000 strokes) benefit from O1’s rapid turnaround and lower material cost.
• Woodworking and Leatherworking Blades: Craftsmen rely on O1 for chisels, plane blades, and leather skiving knives that demand easy resharpening.

Application Comparison Table

Pieteikums	A2 instrumentu tērauds	O1 instrumentu tērauds
Tukšošana & Piercing Dies	Liela apjoma (50 000+ strokes), deep-draw, minimāls izkropļojums	Not recommended—higher wear, soft core risk
Veidošanās & Bending Tools	Deep-draw punches, high-load forming	Light forming, prototype dies
Progressive Die Components	Multi-station dies, large sections	Mazs, simple dies
Griezt & Slitting Blades	Heavy-gauge sheet cutting	Slitting vinyl, papīrs, gumijas
Mērinstrumenti & Piespraudes	Durable under repeated use	Precision gauges, low-wear applications
Craft Blades (Wood/Leather)	Occasional use—requires regrinding	Frequent resharpening, fine edge retention
Prototype vs. Production Runs	Best for production runs > 20 000 gabaliem	Best for prototyping and runs < 10 000 gabaliem

10. Secinājums

A2 vs O1 tool steel represents two proven solutions for cold work applications, each tailored to specific performance and economic needs.

A2’s superior toughness, nodilums pretestība, and dimensional stability justify its use in demanding, liela apjoma operācijas.

Tikmēr, O1 provides exceptional edge retention and machinability at a lower cost, making it a reliable choice for simpler or low-production tooling.

Although there are some differences in the physical properties of these two steels, both A2 and O1 tool steels are affordable materials that are suitable for many of the same applications.

 

FAQ

Which steel achieves higher wear resistance?

A2 provides superior wear resistance due to its higher chromium (4.75–5.50 %) and vanadium content, which form fine, uniformly dispersed carbides.

O1, with lower alloying levels, delivers moderate wear performance but compensates with excellent edge sharpness.

Which tool steel offers better dimensional stability?

A2 air-hardening creates gentler thermal gradients, reducing distortion by up to 70 % compared to O1’s oil quench.

Designers prefer A2 for large or complex dies that demand tight tolerances with minimal post-grind corrections.

How do they resist corrosion?

A2’s ~5 % chromium content confers mild corrosion resistance, suitable for dry or lightly humid environments.

O1, with under 1 % hroms, requires protective oils or coatings to prevent surface rust in most operating conditions.

Which tool steel offers better fatigue performance?

A2 typically demonstrates a fatigue limit of about 45 % of its ultimate tensile strength, whereas O1’s fatigue limit sits around 40 %.

In cyclic-loading applications—such as stamping or cold forming—A2 reduces the risk of fatigue failure over long run lengths.