Casting Tolerances by Different Casting Processes

A casting tolerance specifies the allowable deviation between a feature’s nominal and actual size.

ʻo kahi laʻana, a ±0.5 mm tolerance on a 100 mm dimension means the finished part may measure anywhere between 99.5 MM O 100.5 mm.

Such precision influences component fit, ʻO ka hana mechanication, a assembly reliability.

I ka manawa like, every tenth of a millimeter shaved off the tolerance budget can increase mold cost by 10–20%, raise scrap rates by up to 15%, a add two to four weeks of tooling lead time.

This article surveys a range of casting processes—from green‐sand i make buring—and quantifies their typical tolerance capabilities.

We’ll also review Iso 8062 and other industry standards, outline necessary pattern and machining allowances,

and recommend inspection a statistical‐process‐control methods that help you strike the optimal balance between cost and precision.

1. Understanding Tolerances in Casting

Before selecting a process, clarify these foundational concepts:

• TOLECE is the total allowable variation in a dimension.
• Allowance is the deliberate oversize or undersize built in for casting shrinkage, draft, or subsequent machining.
• Fit describes how two mating parts interact, mai clearance fits (loose) i interference fits (tight).

Eia hou, casting tolerances may be Lauloa (E.g., ±0.5 mm) Oole geometric (E.g., circularity, perpendicularity), defined using GD&T symbols.

Remember: each class of tolerance you specify can translate into tangible cost and schedule impacts.

NOEHUI, careful upfront planning—aligned with your manufacturing partner’s capabilities—pays dividends in quality and total cost of ownership.

2. Standards and Nomenclature

Before specifying tolerances, you need a common language. International and regional standards define both huahuai a geometric casting tolerances, so designers and foundries can speak with precision.

Iso 8062 Casting Tolerance (CT) and Geometric Casting Tolerance (GCT)

Iso 8062-3 defines Dimensional Casting Tolerance (DCT) grades from CT1 through CT16, where lower CT numbers correspond to tighter as-cast tolerances. I ka hoʻomaʻamaʻa:

• CT1–CT4 (±0.05–0.3 % of dimension) suit high-precision die-casting and permanent-mold parts.
• CT5–CT9 (±0.1–0.8 %) apply to investment and shell-mold castings.
• CT10–CT14 (±0.4–2.0 %) cover various sand-casting methods.
• CT15–CT16 (±2.5–3.5 %) serve very large or non-critical castings.

ʻo kahi laʻana, on a 200 mm feature:

• A CT4 part might hold ±0.6 mm,
• While a CT12 sand casting might allow ±4 mm.

Complementing CT grades, Iso 8062-2 defines Geometrical Casting Tolerances (GCT)—covering form (flatness, circularity), Kaniona (perpendicularity, parallelism), and position (true position).

Each GCT grade (G1–G8) layers geometric control onto the nominal CT dimensional envelope.

Regional & Industry Specifications

While ISO provides a global framework, many industries reference tailored standards:

NADCA (North American Die Casting Association):

• Maʻamau tolerance: ±0.25 mm per 100 mm (approx. ISO CT3–CT4).
• 'Clelo pololei tolerance: ±0.10 mm per 100 mm (approx. ISO CT1–CT2).
• NADCA also defines separate classes for height, hole, a flatness tolerances specific to die-cast materials such as zinc, aluminum, and magnesium.

SFSA 2000 (Steel Founders’ Society of America):

• Provides sand-casting tolerances ranging ±0.4–1.6 mm per 100 mm, depending on mold type (green-sand vs. resin-bonded).
• Its tables correspond roughly to ISO CT11–CT13.

BS 6615 (British Standard for Foundry)

• Covers Sand, shell, a investment nā kaʻina hana.
• Typical allowances:

• • Sand casting ±0.5–2.0 mm/100 mm (CT11–CT14)
  • Shell casting ±0.2–0.8 mm/100 mm (CT8–CT12)
  • Investment casting ±0.1–0.5 mm/100 mm (CT5–CT9)

3. Casting tolerance table (unit: mm)

The following table lists the maximum total tolerance values ​​for different CT grades (Casting Tolerance Grade CT1–CT16) within different basic size ranges.

4. Overview of Major Casting Processes

Casting processes fall into three broad categories—expendable‐mold, permanent‐mold/pressure‐driven, a specialty techniques—each offering distinct tolerance capabilities, Lalau kikowaena, and cost structures.

Expendable-Mold Methods

Green-Sand Casting

Green-sand casting remains the most economical and flexible method for large or simple parts.

Foundries mix silica sand, pāanikino, and moisture to form molds that yield typical ISO CT11–CT14 tolerances—about ±0.5–2.0% of any given dimension (I.e., ±0.5–2.0 mm on 100 mm).

Surface finish generally ranges Ra 6–12 μm, and tooling cost stays low (pinepine <$500 no kēlā me kēia kumu).

Chemically-Bonded & No-Bake Sand

Upgrading to resin-bonded or no-bake sand molds tightens tolerances to CT9–CT12 (±0.3–1.2%), improves mold strength, and reduces wash-out.

Surface roughness drops to Ra 3–6 μm, making these methods well suited for medium-complexity parts where green-sand precision proves marginal.

Waiwai kūʻai (Lost-Wax) Kauhi

Kāhaka kūʻai kūʻai, also known as lost-wax, produces intricate shapes and thin walls with CT5–CT9 tolerances—approximately ±0.1–0.5% (±0.1–0.5 mm per 100 mm).

Ia excellent surface finish (Ra 0.8–2.0 μm) and ability to maintain fine detail justify higher tooling costs (often $2,000–$10,000 per pattern) I Aerospace, olakino, and high-end industrial applications.

Nalowale-wāwae

Lost-foam casting combines expendable patterns with unbonded sand, offering CT10–CT13 capabilities (±0.4–1.5%).

While surface finish (Ra 4–8 μm) and dimensional control fall between green-sand and investment casting, this method excels at producing complex, single-piece assemblies without cores.

Permanent-Mold & Pressure-Driven Methods

Make buring (Wela & Cold Chamber)

Make buring yields the tightest as-cast tolerances—CT1–CT4, Oole ±0.05–0.3% of dimension (±0.05–0.3 mm per 100 mm).

Typical surface finish ranges Ra 0.5–1.5 μm. High upfront tooling costs (often $10,000–$200,000 per die) pay off in cycle times as fast as 15–60 seconds and excellent repeatability for aluminum, zinc, and magnesium parts.

Gravity Die & Low-Pressure Die Casting

Gravity and low-pressure die casting, using reusable metal molds, hoʻokō CT2–CT6 aiko (±0.1–0.5%) me Ra 1–4 μm pau ai.

Because they operate without high injection speeds, these methods reduce porosity and strengthen components—particularly in automotive wheel and pump applications.

Specialty Techniques

Centrifugal Casting

By spinning molds at 200–2,000 RPM, centrifugal casting forces molten metal outward, producing dense pipe walls and rings. Radial tolerance falls in CT3–CT8 (±0.1–0.5%).

Surface finish typically sits at Ra 3–8 μm, and directional cooling enhances mechanical properties in heavy-duty bearings and piping.

Plaster & Ceramic Mold Casting

Plaster and ceramic molds—largely used for art, Kōhai, and small-batch aerospace parts—provide CT6–CT9 aiko (±0.2–0.8%) a Ra 2–5 μm pau ai.

Although slower and more expensive than sand, these processes accommodate fine detail and special alloys.

5. Tolerance Capabilities by Casting Process

I kēia'āpana, we present a consolidated view of each process’s typical Iso 8062 CT grade,

its corresponding linear tolerance (as a percentage of dimension and in millimeters on 100 mm), and a representative paulapua.

6. Factors Affecting Casting Tolerances

Casting tolerances are not fixed properties of a process—they result from a complex interplay between material behavior, tooling design, process parameters, and part geometry.

Waiwai waiwai

The type of metal or alloy directly affects shrinkage, flowability, and dimensional stability.

• Thermal Contraction Rates: Metals shrink upon cooling. ʻo kahi laʻana:

• • Iron Roil: ~1.0%
  • Aluminum alloys: ~1.3%
  • Zinc alloys: ~0.7%
  • Kukui Kekuhi: ~2.0% (varies with carbon content)

Higher shrinkage results in more dimensional deviation unless compensated by tooling design.

• Fluidity and Solidification Behavior:

• • Metals with higher fluidity (E.g., aluminum, bronze) fill molds more precisely.
  • Rapid solidification in thin sections or low-fluidity metals can cause voids and uneven shrinkage.

• Alloying Effects:

• • Silikino in cast iron improves fluidity but also increases expansion.
  • Nickel a Chromium enhance dimensional stability in steels.

Mold and Tooling Variables

The mold system is often the single largest contributor to as-cast dimensional variation.

• Pattern Accuracy:

• • CNC-machined patterns achieve far better tolerance than hand-crafted ones.
  • Wear over time degrades precision—especially in high-volume sand casting.

• Draft Angles:

• • Required to release the casting from the mold, typical angles are:

• • • 1°–3° for external surfaces
    • 5°–8° for internal cavities

• • Excessive draft adds dimensional variation and must be accounted for.

• Mold Rigidity and Expansion:

• • Sand molds are compressible and expand under heat, which affects tolerances.
  • Metal dies (in die casting) are more dimensionally stable, supporting tighter tolerances.

• Ka HōʻaʻO Kokua:

• • Fast cooling (E.g., metal molds) minimizes distortion.
  • Lohi mālie (E.g., ceramic or plaster molds) allows more time for material contraction and deformation.

Kaʻina hana

How the metal is poured, ua paʻa, and cooled significantly alters final dimensions.

• Pouring Temperature:

• • Overheating increases mold erosion and exaggerates shrinkage.
  • Underheating leads to poor mold filling and cold shuts.

• Gating and Risering Design:

• • Poor gating can cause turbulence and air entrapment, leading to porosity and distortion.
  • Insufficient risers result in shrink cavities that reduce geometric integrity.

• Cooling Rate and Solidification Control:

• • Techniques such as chills, venting, a controlled cooling zones help refine dimensional accuracy.
  • In thicker sections, uneven solidification may cause differential shrinkage a Kākoʻo.

• Section Thickness and Complexity:

• • Thin sections cool faster, resulting in smaller grain size and better dimensional control.
  • Complex geometries with varying wall thicknesses are prone to nā wahi wela a nā kaumaha kūloko, affecting the final shape.

Part Size and Geometry

Larger parts accumulate more thermal and mechanical stresses, leading to increased distortion:

• A 1000 mm steel casting may vary ±3–5 mm, while a 100 mm aluminum part can maintain ±0.1 mm with investment casting.
• Asymmetrical parts often warp due to unbalanced cooling and uneven metal flow.
• Incorporating uniform wall thickness, nā iwi iʻa, a rounded transitions enhances dimensional predictability.

Summary Table – Key Factors & Typical Impacts

Hānō	Typical Impact on Tolerance
Thermal Shrinkage of Material	+0.7% i +2.5% deviation from mold dimension
Pattern Accuracy (manual vs CNC)	±0.5 mm to ±0.05 mm variance
Draft Angle Requirement	Adds 0.1–1 mm per 100 mm of depth
Pouring Temp Deviation (±50°C)	Up to ±0.2 mm dimensional shift
Wall Thickness Variation	Can cause ±0.3–0.6 mm distortion
Mold Expansion (sand vs metal)	±0.1 mm to ±1.0 mm depending on mold type

7. Allowances in Pattern and Mold Design

To achieve final tolerances, designers build in specific allowances:

• ʻAeʻia: Add 1.0–1.3 mm per 100 mm for aluminum, 1.0 mm/100 mm for iron.
• Draftʻae: 1°–3° taper per vertical face.
• Machinaʻaeʻia: 1-3 mm (depending on process and feature criticality).
• Distortion & Shake: Extra 0.5–1.0 mm in thin walls to counter pattern shake and distortion.

Ma meticulously applying these values, engineers ensure that the as-cast oversize positions critical dimensions into the desired tolerance window.

8. Design for Tolerance Control

Effective design minimizes the gap between as-cast and finished dimensions:

• Near-Net Shape: Aim to deliver features within ±10% of final size, reducing machining by 70%.
• GD&T Focus: Apply tight controls only to critical interfaces; allow CT-grade tolerances on non‐critical surfaces.
• Geometry Guidelines: Use generous fillets (>1 mm radius), uniform wall thickness (≤10 mm variation), and strategically placed ribs to limit distortion.

Such intentional feature design helps castings emerge closer to their target geometry, preserving both cost and quality.

9. Inspection and Quality Assurance

CMMs, laser scanners, and CT systems enable rapid, high‐density measurement:

• Vernier & Micrometer: Quick “spot checks” for first-pass verification.
• CMM/Optical Scanning: Full-field mapping against CAD models; typical uncertainty: ±0.005 mm.
• CT Scanning: Validates internal geometries, pore distribution, and wall‐thickness uniformity.

Quality plans should include First Article Inspection (FAI), PPAP for automotive, Oole AQL sampling (E.g., AQL 1.0) for high‐volume runs.

Root-cause analysis targets tolerance excursions—whether due to mold shift, thermal distortion, or pattern wear.

10. Statistical Process Capability

To quantify your casting operation’s ability to meet tolerance:

• Calculate Cp (process potential) a Cpk (process performance) values; aim for Cp ≥1.33 a Cpk ≥1.0 for robust tolerance control.
• Hoʻohana Spc charts to monitor critical casting parameters: mold hardness, ka nininiʻana, and dimension trends.
• Implement DOE (Design of Experiments) to identify key factors and optimize gating, Palapala Moho, a me nā uku hōʻoluʻolu.

11. Hopena

Casting tolerances represent a critical nexus of design intent, process capability, and economic reality.

By grounding decisions in Iso 8062 CT grades, aligning with NADCA Oole SFSA koi, and incorporating proper pattern allowances, engineers and foundries can deliver parts that meet both performance and budget goals.

Eia hou, rigorous inspection, statistical control, a emerging digital technologies—from 3D‐printed sand molds to real-time simulation—are tightening as-cast tolerances and reducing expensive downstream machining.

Lākahi, the right tolerance strategy ensures that your cast component transitions smoothly from pattern shop to assembly line, on time, on budget, and within specification.